Saturday, August 24, 2013

A Review of THE HORSEHAIR BALL GOWN by Bobbie Ann Mason Published by Virginia Quarterly Review - Spring 2013

The Virginia Quarterly Review gives us yet another look at what it is like to be alive.  This one displaces old memories, both in me and in its characters.
It takes spare time and some bit of love to appreciate the “teacup-and-doily world” in which two old ladies live in self-imposed exile.  The reward here had to do with something that becomes a meditation as a person ages.  You begin to think about fate, and how it works, and how it is defeated, on occasion.  The Greek and Christian sides of that two-headed coin compete for your wavering faith.  Competition is good, I have been told.  Personally, I hate it.
Bobbie Ann Mason’s story resurrects an incident which might have been trivial in many other lives but which was pivotal in the girlhood of “Little Bit” and “Puss.”  Now, seventy years later, after lives of “tabbyhood,” the incident rises up with new power to ally with a new incident, which, like the older one, would have been harmless—not even worth mentioning—in nearly any other life.  But not these.  Mason’s story ends before we see it unwind, but we know it is going to kill the older sister and ruin the other.  It will be an arrow tipped with a poison compounded to kill only them.  Mason shows us that irony can have lethal persistence. 
Lunch at Harvey’s in Lexington, Ky., will remind us of the stubborn wrath of god.  If ever we thought God had grown modern, Mason shows us that still he seeks atonements from the keepers of cold altars.  And, if you should prefer the abstract, we can call it fate.
I stopped.  I remembered almost exactly where to go.  I pulled Mason’s first book off one of my shelves.  Inside was the review from Time Magazine.  It was early in 1983.  It was one of those “Geritol books” I dutifully swallowed— even in the midst of a killer business world several times harsher than almost any other businessman would ever come to know.
I knew that one day, I would write, somehow—and make use of that degree—after the kids were grown and after I had killed my final alligator.  And so back then, and for that reason, I grimly, dutifully read Bobby Ann Mason one-handed, while diapering with the other and an elbow.
No, you cannot expect a young man with the highest testosterone count ever recorded to dote on stories of the life contained in a drop of pond water.  But I am ready now.  I am not confessing that I am a dried stick.  But now, yes, it is right for me. 
Plato had something in the Republic about this (when he and his pals ran into Sophocles), but that shall be another blog, sometime.  Remind me.
Yes, I forgive myself for breezing through her first book.  However, The Horsehair Ball Gown has unlocked it and this next read will be a good one, I predict.  I shall give Shiloh and Other Stories the thoughtful, watchful reading it deserved 30 years ago, when I zoomed through it.  It just did not happen to fit my pistol back then.
Since I believe that I write about what other people think about, I suspect that this shall become a minor trend.  Boomers shall start to read.  You heard it here first.  Border’s may simply have missed it by a few years.  Such a close one!  We will call them “Battered Border’s Better Boomers.”  By the way, what do snotty literary critics mean by “Boomer angst?”
Now remember, neighbors, The Horsehair Ball Gown is not going to be like wrestling a drunk to the barroom floor and going home without a scratch to brag about it.  You are going to have to open it like you do butterfly legs, and you will take it easy.  Hear?  This is going to be like taking time with a woman that you want to see again.
I have always thought that Shakespeare is prized today for a lot of clever quipage that was likely commonplace back then.  The point is, he saved it for us, and now we give him full credit for it all.
Mason does this too.  “Going to heaven in house shoes,” and “Tiptoe Day,” and “Better than sex cake” shall now live on and on.  Mason still has those “Burns and Allen” moments.  A case in point, the old ladies politely listen to the waitress brag about her kid that goes to a magnet school.  When she leaves, they puzzle over why any sane mother would brag on a child that is retarded or disabled.  This will tend to happen to folks who have not read the newspaper for 40 years.
It seems that many years ago, when the two sisters were trying to survive their childhood (with pretty-good, but typically imperfect parents), there had been an older sister and one who had no pet name.  Geisel was wild.
The youngest sister lied to protect Geisel and the middle one would not.  They coerced Little Bit into an honesty that backfired when their father barked so hard that Geisel ran away.
Foolishly, Mom and Dad ignored her letters and so she stayed gone.  Now the incident at Harvey’s in Lexington has raised up dreams of this in Puss.  This rattles both of them.
Still looking to fix things, Little Bit cannot leave well enough alone.  Fate was laying for them in a little chain of innocence—one end of it nearly forgotten, the other as fresh as two Thursdays ago.


Offered by the Booktender of the GOOD STORY Saloon – August 24, 2013

No comments:

Post a Comment